# Glitch City Laboratories Archives

Glitch City Laboratories closed on 1 September 2020 (announcement). This is an archived copy of a thread from Glitch City Laboratories Forums.

You can join Glitch City Research Institute to ask questions or discuss current developments.

You may also download the archive of this forum in .tar.gz, .sql.gz, or .sqlite.gz formats.

## Pokémon Discussion

### Pokemon Breeding - Page 2

Previous Page

- 1
- 2

Next Page

#### Re: Pokemon Breeding

Posted by: Bent`
Date: 2009-08-27 15:17:10
Guys, the word is palette. A pallet is a wooden crate.

#### Re: Pokemon Breeding

Posted by: Ratipharos
Date: 2009-08-27 15:34:18

> Dictionary: pal?let1 (păl'ĭt)
> 6.A painter's palette.

Of course, I agree. The more correct form is pallete. Although I also spell it moustache.

#### Re: Pokémon Breeding

Posted by: Torchickens
Date: 2009-09-13 12:23:10
Well, if this was implemented there would certainly be over 9000 Pokémon, taking into account 493*493 = 243049, yet not all Pokémon can breed. In the next games it would turn out to be an accurate representation of real life evolution in about another billion years? You would most likely see some kind of weird torchic hybrid with teeth which evovles into something deadly. 243049*243049= 59072816401 presuming every Pokémon breeds which it doesn't so a significant amount less.

#### Re: Pokémon Breeding

Posted by: Ratipharos
Date: 2009-09-13 13:02:18
Actually, I think it would be 493^493.

#### Re: Pokémon Breeding

Posted by: Torchickens
Date: 2009-09-13 13:20:37

> Actually, I think it would be 493^493.

Perhaps, my maths isn't so good but that would mean 3.74x101327 Pokémon?! It seems a bit too large to imagine.

#### Re: Pokémon Breeding

Posted by: ?????(000)
Date: 2009-09-13 14:16:23

> 59072816401

that's a hell of a lot of Pokémon.

#### Re: Pokémon Breeding

Posted by: Bent`
Date: 2009-09-13 17:25:48

> Actually, I think it would be 493^493.

It would actually be 493 factorial (493 492 491 3 2 1), unless the sex of the parents matters.

#### Re: Pokémon Breeding

Posted by: Ratipharos
Date: 2009-09-13 19:26:26

> > Actually, I think it would be 493^493.

> It would actually be 493 factorial (493 492 491 3 2 1), unless the sex of the parents matters.

1.6290 x 10^1115. Ack.
Although it would be SO fun to play.
Previous Page

- 1
- 2

Next Page