Huge rant over a picture on the internet.
Posted by: tachi
Date: 2013-11-20 14:19:52
Okay so a lot of people on the internet seems to agree on basically this:
[img]http://cdn.overclock.net/c/c5/600x496px-LL-c5a37b6a_Look2Bat2Bthis2Bguy.jpeg[/img]
However, I have to disagree with a part of that statement.
for one, the definition of hobby states that it is an activity that one does regularly for pleasure. By assumption, the activity taking place is buying anime, manga, and toys alike; in other words, collecting. But what exactly causes one to collect? Well this can be an option out of many different things. According to this article one might collect to preserve the past, for the quest to get the entire collection (which is usually never completed), a satisfaction from the experimentation. However, what sets hoarding apart from collecting? When collecting can be a problem, it is considered hoarding, and is usually set apart due to the psychology, or severity of the matter. When someone is depressed, or fears the lack of control, they are more likely to become hoarders than those who aren't.
Now let's look back at this picture, we see a happy man with a lot of manga, anime, toys, and is holding what i assume is a dvd for lucky star. But who's to say this man is really happy? As said in the article, the happiness a collector receives is from the acquirement of a new piece. Is the man smiling because he "lives the way he wants to" or is he temporarily excited because he has a new part to add to the colossal of dvds on his book shelf? My question is, is that happiness? To be cursed under the stress of having to find and purchase every part of the subject just to feel accomplished in life, not having complete satisfactory until the job is finally done. I don't believe a man can be perfectly happy, so he must pursuit it till the end, but a life bent on working to get every part of a collection, and constant sacrifice/trade offs, which is normally never achieved, is a better way to seek pleasure?
A picture says a thousand words, but are all the words truth? It states that he is able to finance, but yet what evidence in that photo made him/her to say that? In this case, we are all left to assume, but because of the possibilities, is saying that he isn't can never be correct? Isn't it possible that the man lives with others who support him and his needs and wants? Isn't it possible that the man has taken loans or borrowed money to appease his satisfaction of collecting? The answer is, only the people who are truly associated with the picture knows. Since we are all left to assume, nothing I say, and that caption, cannot prove what is really happening in that picture.
A quote I heard the other day said "when you assume, all you do is make an ass out of u and me."