Glitch City Laboratories Archives

Glitch City Laboratories closed on 1 September 2020 (announcement). This is an archived copy of a thread from Glitch City Laboratories Forums.

You can join Glitch City Research Institute to ask questions or discuss current developments.

You may also download the archive of this forum in .tar.gz, .sql.gz, or .sqlite.gz formats.

Wiki Discussion

Rule Revisions - Page 2

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: LedZeplin2
Date: 2007-12-18 16:23:05
Well, if it weren't specific, it wouldn't say loopholes to begin with, would it?

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: Zach the Glitch Buster
Date: 2007-12-20 09:49:54

Well, if it weren't specific, it wouldn't say loopholes to begin with, would it?

Thats debatable


Also we should make it so that debates are started unbiased.

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: PichuUmbreon
Date: 2007-12-20 10:51:09

Also we should make it so that debates are started unbiased.

Disagreed. Because, if a debate thread was started unbiased, then it wouldn't be a debate thread, just a poll thread.

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: LedZeplin2
Date: 2007-12-20 10:54:00
I love how people state their opinions are actually facts…

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: PichuUmbreon
Date: 2007-12-20 11:09:50

I love how people state their opinions are actually facts…

Yeah, especially when they state their religions and morals are facts.

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: Zach the Glitch Buster
Date: 2007-12-20 11:40:01


Also we should make it so that debates are started unbiased.

Disagreed. Because, if a debate thread was started unbiased, then it wouldn't be a debate thread, just a poll thread.

Well by unbiased, I mean not like this:
What is better? The good magic of oil that has never failed us before, or the evil corruption of alternative energy.

But something like this:
What is better? oil or alternative energy?  I think oil is the only way to go and that alternative energy is evil and corrupt.

This would only be for the first post.

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: PichuUmbreon
Date: 2007-12-20 13:00:13



Also we should make it so that debates are started unbiased.

Disagreed. Because, if a debate thread was started unbiased, then it wouldn't be a debate thread, just a poll thread.

Well by unbiased, I mean not like this:
What is better? The good magic of oil that has never failed us before, or the evil corruption of alternative energy.

But something like this:
What is better? oil or alternative energy?  I think oil is the only way to go and that alternative energy is evil and corrupt.

This would only be for the first post.

Most of my debate threads would be breaking that rule. :\

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: xparasite9
Date: 2007-12-30 15:51:22


I love how people state their opinions are actually facts…

Yeah, especially when they state their religions and morals are facts.
You're not innocent of this, yourself.

Re: Rule Revisions

Posted by: Zach the Glitch Buster
Date: 2007-12-31 00:24:16



I love how people state their opinions are actually facts…

Yeah, especially when they state their religions and morals are facts.
You're not innocent of this, yourself.

He never said he was