Glitch City Laboratories Archives

Glitch City Laboratories closed on 1 September 2020 (announcement). This is an archived copy of a thread from Glitch City Laboratories Forums.

You can join Glitch City Research Institute to ask questions or discuss current developments.

You may also download the archive of this forum in .tar.gz, .sql.gz, or .sqlite.gz formats.

General Discussion

Paradoxes - Page 4

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: PichuUmbreon
Date: 2008-12-13 23:06:49
Invisible Pink Unicorn.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: atoms2ashes
Date: 2008-12-13 23:27:08

Quote from Harry Potter:
"Neither can live while the other survives"
Isn't this a paradox?


Nope. It means both would die.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: Bluelatios
Date: 2008-12-14 21:54:51
I thought of another random paradox. Knowing where nowhere is.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: Abwayax
Date: 2008-12-14 22:04:18

Quote from Harry Potter:
"Neither can live while the other survives"
Isn't this a paradox?

No - it just means that one of them has to die.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: :56 ERROR
Date: 2008-12-14 23:50:40

I thought of another random paradox. Knowing where nowhere is.

Paradox!

What about these?
An indestructible object is destroyed
and now for the ironic paradox…
Drowning in the fountain of pure life

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: fivex
Date: 2008-12-15 14:36:22
Hmm, when a unmovable round object gets hit  by an unstoppable force, the force bounces off of the round unmovable object!

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: PichuUmbreon
Date: 2008-12-15 18:59:55

Hmm, when a unmovable round object gets hit  by an unstoppable force, the force bounces off of the round unmovable object!


Or maybe the unstoppable force goes through the unmovable object.

I once read that the reason you can't go through a solid object is not because your atoms and its atoms collide and can't go through each other, but is actually because the atoms exert a force that keeps other atoms from going through them.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: Bent`
Date: 2008-12-15 19:24:57


Hmm, when a unmovable round object gets hit  by an unstoppable force, the force bounces off of the round unmovable object!


Or maybe the unstoppable force goes through the unmovable object.

I once read that the reason you can't go through a solid object is not because your atoms and its atoms collide and can't go through each other, but is actually because the atoms exert a force that keeps other atoms from going through them.

Yes. It?s sort of the same thing you experience when pushing two positive or two negative magnets together.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: :56 ERROR
Date: 2008-12-15 21:12:36



Hmm, when a unmovable round object gets hit  by an unstoppable force, the force bounces off of the round unmovable object!


Or maybe the unstoppable force goes through the unmovable object.

I once read that the reason you can't go through a solid object is not because your atoms and its atoms collide and can't go through each other, but is actually because the atoms exert a force that keeps other atoms from going through them.

Yes. It?s sort of the same thing you experience when pushing two positive or two negative magnets together.

Electromagnetism, check the Quantum Mechanics.
And please don't get me started talking about the interesting world of Quantum Mechanics.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: MissingNo
Date: 2008-12-20 23:36:23
the first number not nameable in under ten words

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: :56 ERROR
Date: 2008-12-21 19:30:32

the first number not nameable in under ten words

We have a winner.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: ultraVex
Date: 2008-12-21 19:56:52
I am you.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: :56 ERROR
Date: 2008-12-21 21:24:05
WIN.

Existing in non-existance.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: ultraVex
Date: 2008-12-23 17:32:26
Soap that makes you dirty.

Re: Paradoxes

Posted by: :56 ERROR
Date: 2008-12-23 19:37:22
Win.

Good evil.